FPA CEO Dante De Gori

The Financial Planning Association has called for a review of ASIC’s adviser levy as part of six recommendations in its budget submission for 2020-21 that are aimed at reducing the cost to practice for advisers.

The annual ASIC levy amount is too unpredictable, FPA CEO Dante De Gori says, which makes it tough for advisers to plan the payment effectively.

“The levy amount each year has proved to be unpredictable, which makes it practically impossible for a financial planner to effectively budget for this business cost,” De Gori says.

ASIC predicted the levy per adviser would be $907 for the 2018-19 financial year, yet the eventual bill was $1,142 – a 26 per cent disparity. Further, the FPA says, the $1,571 ASIC estimates for the 2019-20 financial year is likely to be closer to $2,000.

The association is lobbying the government to review how the industry-funded regulatory model is working in the advice sector, especially considering the steep rise in costs which is set to increase with a shrinking adviser cohort footing the bill.

Over the 2019-20 financial year 3,100 adviser left the industry, the FPA notes.

“The levy per financial planner has increased from $934 in 2017-18 to approximately $2,000 in 2019-20,” De Gori says. “In three years of operation, the levy for financial planners will likely have more than doubled and there is no indication that increases of this scale will cease for 2020-21 or future years.”

“As a first step in addressing these twin challenges of predictability and dramatic levy increases the government should undertake to review the ASIC industry levy,” De Gori said. “As it has been three years since the levy was first introduced, it would be an appropriate time to review its implementation and impact on the financial services sector.”

2 comments on “ASIC’s adviser levy getting out of hand: FPA”
  1. Avatar

    But wait… on Jan 27 2021 this very publication had a front page article – https://www.professionalplanner.com.au/2021/01/adviser-salaries-set-to-soar-as-industry-contracts/ about how adviser salaries are going to boom.
    Sometimes it feels like planners want all the vast income that flows from this industry but none of the costs associated with it.
    Perhaps instead of the constant criticism of ASIC; we could, as an industry, acknowledge the time, skill, knowledge and professionalism required to audit, coach, oversee and regulate advisers, plus remediate and fight for clients in cases such as we have just seen in the High Court this week.
    It is not just planners that work hard to attain there position in this industry. There is a plethora of behind the scenes professionals who support them in their venture. How is this to be funded?
    The industry cannot take itself seriously (or ask anyone else to) and not be regulated also. Should just the taxpayer fit the bill?
    Perhaps if there wasn’t so much less than gold standard activity in our industry for such a long time, the resources required by ASIC to do what they do (and do it they must), then the burden to fund that activity on the very people who have made very comfortable livelihoods out of it might be a little less…

  2. Avatar
    Daniel Budreika

    They should issue each adviser with an FDS that explains what the levy was for the previous 12 months, the services delivered and an estimate for the next 12 months.

Join the discussion