The Federal Government’s decision to ask the Productivity Commission to undertake a study and public inquiry into superannuation has been criticised by Olivia Long, chief executive officer of the SMSF administrators Xpress Super and SuperGuardian.

“In theory it seems like a good idea to get the Productivity Commission to undertake a study to develop criteria to assess the efficiency and competitiveness of the superannuation system, and have a public inquiry to develop alternative models for a formal competitive process to allocate default fund members to products.

“The Productivity Commission is a respected organisation and I’m certain it will produce a worthwhile outcome for the industry.

“However, with the timetable for the study set for nine months and the public inquiry for 18 months, what I fear is that it will create more uncertainty around superannuation, not less.

“With the Productivity Commission there will be papers, submissions, and endless media speculation. At a time when we need stability around the fundamentals of superannuation, another inquiry will continue to sow doubt in the minds of consumers. This will be the worst possible result.

“The Treasurer, Scott Morrison, made this very point at the SMSF Association National Conference when he said that once the Budget was out of the way, then the superannuation industry could expect a respite from change.

“This hardly seems likely with a Productivity Commission study and public inquiry underway, and already we are seeing the various industry groups lobbying for their preferred position.

“The Government has made its position on superannuation quite clear; it wants more competition as this delivers the best outcome for the consumer.”

“Having adopted this position, then surely it should frame the legislation accordingly, and should not require a Productivity Commission study and public inquiry.”

Source: XpressSuper / SuperGuardian

Share your comments and feedback with the editor
What is Cut + Paste? Cut + Paste contains news releases, statements and other information from organisations active in financial planning and related areas. Its aim is to convey that information to you directly from those organisations. Everything published in Cut + Paste has been curated for its relevance and topicality; otherwise, it is predominantly unedited. The views expressed in Cut + Paste do not necessarily reflect those of Professional Planner. To learn more, please click here.