Andrew Gregory

UniSuper head of advice and education Andrew Gregory says he wants the $115 billion industry fund to become a “home for advice professionals”.

The former CEO of boutique firm Arrow Private Wealth and general manager at MLC Advice, who joined UniSuper a year ago to set a new financial advice strategy, has received a mandate from the fund’s board and senior management to grow its financial advice footprint.

Relative to other profit-to-member funds, UniSuper – which until July 2021 was restricted to members in the tertiary education sector – already has a sizeable adviser workforce of about 160 full-time equivalents. Of those, 52 are licensed by UniSuper to provide comprehensive advice, while 37 so-called “superannuation consultants” provide general advice and 19 are limited to intra-fund advice.

But Gregory says the fund is acutely aware it needs to provide more advice in order to meet its obligations to help members transition to retirement under the retirement income covenant. Its origins in the universities sector means full-scale advice is a more natural fit than it is for other funds, he says, with a membership that has the ability and propensity to pay the going rates, which range from $3000 to $6500 for a comprehensive plan.

“The nature of our business is one where advice and education is highly valued, if you think about the heritage coming out of education and research,” he tells Professional Planner.

“The starting point [of my strategy] was a huge privilege that advice matters, and advice is one of those core competencies within UniSuper. Unlike others, we’re wanting to double down in advice.”

Scale, ability, patience

Gregory says large industry funds can help fill the education and training void left by the big four banks, who traditionally ran the academies and provided a career pathway from other corners of financial services to comprehensive advice before retreating from wealth management in the so-called Wexit following the Hayne royal commission. He is eager to develop a graduate and Professional Year program as a priority.

“I think we’re one of the major players to do this,” Gregory says. “We’ve got the scale, we’ve got the ability, we’ve also got the patience to see the long-term benefits of taking people from the beginning of their careers right through to a flourishing career in advice.”

He said recruitment and promotion of female advisers was a specific priority, especially given the fund has a majority female membership.

In order to grow the advice business, Gregory acknowledged he may have to shake off some perceptions of super fund advice broadly in the profession. Chief among them is the arguable conflict that exists within a fund, which is a financial product, giving advice around superannuation.

Gregory says he not only understands this “critique of vertical integration” but admits he was a “bit worried” about what the reality might be before he took on the UniSuper job.

“I’ve been really pleasantly surprised with the discretion that they’ve afforded the advice business,” he stresses. “They can be professionals. They can be fiduciaries. We’re not under any obligations or pressure.”

“It’s something that really matters to me… that I do have a home for advice professionals and can allow them to be able to use their judgment.”

Digital dalliance

He says the advice business maintains an independent APL, with a range of rival ARA-regulated super funds represented, both industry and retail. He also says UniSuper advisers are “absolutely” willing and able to advise members to leave the fund if necessary, describing them as a “strong, honest friend” that can hold the fund to account and provide feedback on what competitors may be doing better.

“We would categorically say that we provide advice that’s in the best interest of the members,” he says. Although he adds the usual caveat favoured by industry fund executives: “the thing that I will note is UniSuper has been voted for number one super fund for low fees and highest returns.”

The clear implication is that advice to switch funds is relatively rare given the fund believes it stacks up on any measure.

Gregory says he wants hybrid financial advice to form part of the fund’s advice strategy, but has so far resisted putting too many eggs in the pure digital advice basket. While some other funds have incorporated digital or robo-advice into their processes, Gregory says he is not rushing. Indeed, he suspects some competitors may wish they had “slowed down” before selecting a partner and beginning to integrate.

“I don’t want to pursue a vendor strategy,” he says.

“Before I go and engage in an external digital advice provider, I need to make sure I’m really clear on what the funds business requirements are. Otherwise, we run the risk of following their strategy and sort of fitting in because it feels convenient.”

One comment on “‘Strong, honest friend’: UniSuper advisers hold fund to account”
    Avatar
    Saeed Shamaee, AFP®

    What was proposed in QAR chapter 7 and is being lobbied for by super funds is that trustees will have the discretion on the advice provided. Off course every super fund trustee believes their super fund is the best fund ever (at least that is what most people expect them to believe!).

    Now, if you are a super fund adviser and your roll out advice funds are more than roll ins, you should expect a tap on the shoulder as you have provided bad advice (QAR 7.1.2) and not in the best interest of your client. This is because the super fund that you are working in probably has received some sort of award and is low cost and high return and should be in best interest of your clients to transfer their funds in not out .

    For the sake of Australian people, let’s make it clear for the public that:

    1. If they go to a certain fund or bank, they should not expect to receive advice to roll out to another fund/bank. It is every business’s nature to attract and retain clients for profitability and satisfaction.
    2. Receiving advice from funds/banks means they will receive scoped advice related to a limited aspect of their situation and it’s only taking into account that particular product, this advice can be also a “good advice”
    3. Anyone who is called a “Financial Adviser” will take into account all aspects of your situation and is trained and is highly qualified to provide holistic or scoped advice, whatever suits you best.
    4. Anyone who works for a fund/bank and provides advice is not called a Financial Adviser. They are called “something else”.

    Then I guess we may have a more clear and transparent industry and at the same time, more Australians are receiving the advice that they expect and deserve.

Join the discussion