Conflicted remuneration at core of FoFA says Kell

The Australian Securities and Investment’s Commission (ASIC) has released its much-anticipated proposed guidance on the conflicted remuneration ban.

Consultation Paper 189 Future of Financial Advice: Conflicted remuneration (CP 189) sets out proposals for guidance about complying with the conflicted remuneration provisions.

The ban on conflicted remuneration includes commissions and volume-based payments in relation to the distribution of and advice about retail investment products.

Such products include managed investments, superannuation, platforms and margin loans. There is also a ban on asset-based fees for borrowed amounts.

The ban on conflicted remuneration operates alongside other FoFA reforms including an obligation for advisers to act in the best interests of clients and a requirement for clients to opt-in to renew ongoing fee agreements.

“The ban on conflicted remuneration is a core element of the FoFA reforms so it’s important we get industry feedback on these proposals,” said ASIC Commissioner, Peter Kell.

‘The purpose of this guidance is to help industry understand the practical operation of these provisions and how ASIC will administer them.

“In particular, we will focus on the substance of the payment or benefit rather than what it is called – renaming a banned commission something else won’t change its substance.

“ASIC wants to work through the FoFA changes in a way that helps industry comply, so we encourage feedback on our proposed approach.”

To read the ASIC guidance, click here.

Submissions to CP 189 close on November 9 2012.

, , , , ,

Leave a Comment

Why the super tax changes will reinforce the strategic case for SMSFs

Why the super tax changes will reinforce the strategic case for SMSFs

When Div 296 passed into law in March 2026, the headline reaction was predictable: a new tax on earnings attributable to superannuation balances above $3 million was framed as an assault on wealthy members. But Arthur Marusevich writes that changes from the Federal Budget show that SMSFs may occupy a stronger position than before.

Sort content by