Rice Warner: Superannuation myths unbundled

11 June 2015 15:05

Several pervasive myths are obscuring a clear picture of sensible reform in superannuation in Australia today. These myths have created a monumental ball of string that should be unbundled. Once sorted, we should kill off the myths. Otherwise, as Michael Rice observes, Australia will be set up for poor retirement outcomes and superannuation policy driven by misinformation.

Australia’s superannuation system has three key building blocks:

the Age Pension
our mandatory employer contributions (now 9.5% of salaries)
tax concessions to encourage voluntary contributions.

Over decades, many changes to all three have created uncertainty for people saving for their retirement.

Prime Minister Abbott tried to bring stability with his recent Captain’s Call that there will be no further changes under his government. Unfortunately, this has led to confusion within his Cabinet and the superannuation industry as there are several reforms currently being considered. These include the recommendations from the National Commission of Audit, the Financial System Inquiry, Treasury’s Retirement Income Review and the forthcoming Tax White Paper Task Force.

It is difficult to see how we can get meaningful reform without change to tax concessions and to the eligibility for the Age Pension. Of course, change brings some winners and some losers – and those in the latter group all vote!

READ ALL THE MYTHS

Source: Rice Warner

Gap between retirement leaders and laggards has grown: ASIC

Retirement

The retirement challenge – solving for the present, pitching for the future

Advice

Advice quality improving, but ‘exceptional’ advice remains elusive

Advice

A small word that sends a big signal there’s a governance issue ahead

Advice

2026 Retirement Leaders Summit

Gap between retirement leaders and laggards has grown: ASIC

A year after regulators put super funds on notice about the unacceptable gap between the best and the worst of responses to the Retirement Income Covenant, the situation has become even worse. The Retirement Leaders Summit in Canberra heard that the leading funds treat retirement as a core business, while the laggards still see it as a compliance exercise.

Simon Hoyle