Anatomy of a sovereign debt crisis

  • 5 September, 2011
  • 0
  • print

Michael Karagianis

Whilst much has been written in the press over recent weeks regarding the problem of sovereign debt in many countries around the world, investors could be forgiven for being confused as to the nature of the issues.

We have seen a number of commentators discuss the US debt issue in the same context as the European and specifically Greece’s debt crisis.  These two issues are in our view poles apart, both in terms of the magnitude of the problem and possible outcomes.

For the US, notwithstanding the recent rating downgrade to AA + from AAA, the near term debt problem is likely being overestimated by many.  It is true that at more than $US14 trillion the US has the largest pool of Government debt of any country.  However, the US is also the largest economy globally.

Greece has by comparison a dramatically smaller debt burden at around Euro 350 billion ($US500 billion).  However, it is a much smaller country – its net debt to GDP ratio is above 150 per cent of GDP, more than double the US.  However, even this doesn’t tell the full story.  The worst aspect for Greece is that the interest rates it must pay on any new debt issued or refinanced have exploded.  Greek government debt is now yielding almost 60 per cent for 1 year bonds and “only” 18 per cent on 10 year bonds.  As a consequence it is now no longer a question if Greece will default, but simply when.  By contrast the yields for equivalent US Treasuries are 0.1 per cent (1 year) and 2.2 per cent (10 year), amongst the lowest globally.

The potential for a default of US Government is effectively zero, despite some misguided views expressed about the inevitability of a US debt default.  In reality it is virtually impossible for the US Government to default irrespective how much debt it issues because that debt is denominated in US dollars and the US Federal Reserve can always print more US dollars to repay Government debt.


 

However, Greek debt is only the tip of the European debt iceberg.  And the European debt crisis will not likely simply evaporate.  It requires decisive action – now.  Europe has the financial resources, should it choose to use them, to underwrite all of Greece’s current and future debt requirements.  However, the real concern is the potential “contagion effect” of this crisis on other countries within Europe, most significantly Italy.  Italy has Government debt around 100 per cent of GDP as is the third most indebted country in the world.  It is highly unlikely Europe would be able to muster sufficient resources to deal with an Italian default.  Therefore quite simply this is a crisis that cannot be allowed to spread beyond Greece.

Like an outbreak of influenza in the human population, a sovereign debt crisis can quickly spread to other countries if left untreated.  Thus far in Europe, the authorities have lacked the required policy resolve to aggressively control the problem.  This needs to change.  Effective prevention in this case is likely to be far more effective in managing the debt crisis moving forward than trying to cure the problem if a broader range of European countries are infected.

Is a positive ending to this story possible?  At the very least the issues are well know now and understood by both investors and policy makers.  Also, we are increasingly under no illusion of the dangers of the “do nothing” approach to this issue.  Further significant financial commitments will be required to convince investors that enough firepower is available if necessary to deal with the crisis.  This will likely mean a further substantial call on taxpayer money in Europe to supplement bailout reserves as well as a newfound willingness by the ECB to use its balance sheet to provide a large part of the solution.  Support on both fronts has been extremely grudging to date. We can only trust that the hesitancy of European policy makers will soon be replaced by a firm and aggressive plan of action.

 Michael Karagianis is an Investment Strategist with MLC.

 

Vote
Is the SMSF space central to your growth strategy?

 

Comments: 0

Leave your comment

  • Filter:
  • Practice Management

    The art and science of running a profitable and efficient financial planning practice.

  • CPD

    Keep your professional knowledge up to date with articles from recognised experts.

  • Professionalism

    What it really means – and what it takes – to be a true professional.

  • Regulation

    Stay abreast of the most recent changes to regulation and the law and how the changes affect your business.

  • Technical

    Product and sector issues interpreted, analysed and explained.

  • SMSF

    Everything you need to know about providing advice and guidance to the trustees of self-managed super funds.

Challenge and consider changing your licensee

The professional obligations of financial planners trump those of their employers and should guide their behaviour in dealing with practices or processes that ... [more]

Legal view: regulation won’t end scams

A senior finance-industry solicitor says the new era of fee-for-service will not automatically end the rorts offered by some commission-based schemes of the ... [more]

AMP’s Helmich on FoFA, recruitment

Steve Helmich, AMP director of financial planning, advice and services says he has never seen the mood more positive amongst AMP’s financial planners. ... [more]

Advisers singled out as Trio saga concludes

An 11-month investigation into the collapse of Trio Capital has concluded with a Parliamentary Joint Committee recommending closer scrutiny of both planners and ... [more]

Compensation key as Trio findings released

The Financial Services Council (FSC) has echoed the sentiment of an independent report calling for a “sense of proportion” in the debate over ... [more]

‘We have allowed product to drive the relationship’

Systemic failure by Australian private banks to service high-net-worth (HNW) individuals has created an opportunity for financial planners to compete for these clients. ... [more]