ATO guidelines on safe harbour for related party LRBAs

“Not as comfortable or as accommodating as one would have hoped from a safe harbour.”
– Michael Hallinan, Special Counsel, Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers

The ATO has issued its Practical Compliance Guidelines as to what constitutes a “safe harbour” for related party LRBAs.  The Guidelines provided guidance only in relation to real property LRBAs and listed shares/securities LRBAs.

No guidance (practical or otherwise) has been provided for private unit trust LRBAs.  Further, the guidance provided is not as comfortable or as accommodating as one would have hoped from a safe harbour.  In particular the maximum LVRs, maximum duration and minimum interest rates are not comfortable.

However, three important points should be made.

1. The release of the Guidelines together with the revised IDs 2015/27 and 28 essentially means that the policy arguments for banning LRBAs are now removed

2. An arrangement outside the parameters of the Guidelines is not automatically “beyond the Pale” as benchmarking remains an option

3. Finally, the practical assistance provided by the Guidelines can only be assessed by living with and experiencing the joy of restructuring of an LRBA to be within the harbour.

Source: Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers 

Leave a Comment

‘Data war’ a major roadblock to big productivity gains for advisers

‘Data war’ a major roadblock to big productivity gains for advisers

A standoff between platforms and advice businesses over who controls client data is holding back productivity gains that could transform the economics of advice. The Professional Planner Licensee Summit heard that platforms are sitting on client data that isn't theirs to keep and the industry can't reach its productivity potential until it changes.

Sort content by