Super funds defy tepid share markets to post respectable returns

After averaging 12.7% per annum over the three previous years, super funds delivered a fourth consecutive calendar return in 2015 with the median growth fund returning a more modest but respectable 5.8%.  The top-performing fund for the year was MTAA, which returned 9.5%.  Even the worst-performing fund in the growth category produced a positive return of 1.8% which is still slightly ahead of inflation for the year.  Growth funds are those that have 61 to 80% of their investments in growth assets and are the ones in which the majority of Australians are invested.

Key highlights include:

  • While the 2015 return of 5.8% is lower than the previous three years (12.8% in 2012, 17.2% in 2013 and 8.5% in 2014), members shouldn’t be disappointed with the result.  The typical longer-term return objective for these funds is to beat inflation by 3% to 4% per annum, and with the inflation figure likely to come in well under 2% for the year they’ve pretty much hit that target.
  • The better performing funds were generally those that maintained a relatively high exposure to foreign currency (because of the decline in value of the Australian dollar), Australian listed property, unlisted property, unlisted infrastructure and private equity, and a lower exposure to Australian shares, hedged international shares, the broader bond market, hedge funds and cash.
  • Long-term return and risk objectives have been achieved. When we look back over the 23½ years since the introduction of compulsory super, growth funds have returned 8% per annum on average, outperforming inflation by 5.4% per annum.
  • Industry funds outperformed retail funds over the year, returning 6.7% versus 5.2%.

Read full report

Source: Chant West

Leave a Comment

Why CGT changes won’t shift investor behaviour

Why CGT changes won’t shift investor behaviour

The current debate about reducing the 50 per cent CGT discount assumes property investors are primarily motivated by tax savings. Financial adviser Sheshan Wickramage writes the assumption overlooks how real-world investment decisions are made, particularly among high-net-worth investors.

Sort content by