Retirees need to find their way to a retirement solution that is suitable for their needs.

In a newly released research report (feedback appreciated) we address the various mechanisms through which this could occur.

The retirement system is currently configured around two mechanisms. One is a retiree taking personal financial advice. However, some people find this too expensive, and this pathway is constrained by limits on the number of people the financial planning community can practically serve.

Another is a retiree choosing for themselves. This is a daunting task that many people neither have the desire to do, nor the capacity to do so effectively.

Which raises the question: what other options are available? In particular, what role might be played by superannuation fund trustees?

Superannuation funds are currently developing retirement income solutions for their members and decision support services to help them choose. However, trustees going a step further to explicitly direct members towards solutions is problematic under the financial advice rules.

If a member asks their fund ‘what solution would work for me?’, it is highly likely they won’t get a direct answer.

Against this background, the role of trustees in guiding members to retirement solutions is a live issue following the Quality of Advice Review. The QAR proposed a broad range of providers advising on a large range of topics under a ‘good advice’ obligation. The Government’s response has been to focus on retirement as a critical unmet advice need that could be addressed through super funds.

The rationale for using funds is that trustees need to guide members under the Retirement Income Covenant and operate under strong duties and regulatory frameworks. A mechanism that draws on the intra-fund advice framework is a possibility.

Meanwhile, there has also been talk around retirement defaults. While AustralianSuper has been at the forefront of this conversation we are also hearing some discussion around the industry.