Australian adults believe financial advice is worth, on average, $300 upfront, according to Investment Trends’ 2010 Planner Business Model Report, to be released later this month.

Its preliminary results found that on average, clients believe financial advice should cost $300 for the initial consultation, then $300 for each ongoing visit.

For most financial planning businesses, $300 for providing advice is nowhere close to break-even, as the report showed advisers estimated they should be charging $2,700 for full advice and $1,200 for simple advice.

Investment Trends analyst Recep Peker says that the low value placed on financial services depends on whether advice has been used previously.

“It is more of an expectation gap,” Peker says. “Those that have not received advice before think that it will be a lot cheaper, whereas those that have had their first-hand experience with an adviser are prepared to pay more for advice.”

Peker says the survey demonstrates many clients are still “unaware of the true cost of advice, under existing asset-based fee models”.

The report revealed clients are willing to pay different amounts for financial services, depending on the type of advice they require, such as investment property loans, investing in shares, home loans and consolidating personal loans.

Clients are willing to pay more for retirement advice – on average, $540 for the initial consultation then $660 for ongoing consultations – suggesting advice is recognised as most valuable when reviewing retirement plans.

The proportions of clients who would seek advice for reviewing their plan for retirement were:

  • 65 years old and over – 24 per cent;
  • Baby boomers – 23 per cent;
  • Generation X – 6 to 7 per cent; and
  • Generation Y – 0 per cent.

“This shows why retirement came out as the highest amount, as with the younger generations this is not in their time horizon yet,” Peker says.

Investment Trends also conducted the April 2010 SMSF Investor Report, revealing how attitudes towards fees have changed in the past 12 months.

“Essentially, we saw a greater aversion to fees,” Peker says.

“Those that have had their first-hand experience with an adviser are prepared to pay more for advice”

“Overall, 25 per cent of those that responded said they were reluctant to pay fees for financial advice in the future, which is up from 21 per cent last year. A further 15 per cent said they expect to pay lower fees for advice in the future and 15 per cent said they expect to pay [higher] fees for financial advice in the future, provided that it was good advice.”

Mark Rantall, chief executive of the Financial Planning Association of Australia (FPA), says that consumers don’t want to pay more for advice than they perceive it is worth.

“Those people that are paying have received comprehensive advice and therefore recognise its value, whereas those that have not experienced financial advice don’t really understand what’s involved,” Rantall says.

“This is about the complexity of advice – and $300 is probably not going to get you far.

“There is a disconnect of the time taken to give advice and the value that it’s actually worth. It surprises me that there’s such a big gap but with the lack of education for clients about the financial planning industry; the result [of the report] doesn’t surprise me.”

Paul Barrett, general manager of Colonial First State Advice Business, says the challenge advisers need to overcome concerns trust.

“Ultimately we have to translate trust into value and that will happen through the education of clients,” Barrett says.

“Another challenge for financial planners is that they have to give discipline, coaching and commitment to the advice to prevent clients reaching retirement without enough funds.

“When you really think about why advice is not valued, one of the key conclusions you can come to is the fact that the benefits of advice manifest over many years so you don’t actually get the instant gratification from advice that most consumers seek.”

Richard Klipin, chief executive of the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA), says that a large number of people perceive financial advisers as “opaque and self-motivated and worse, untrustworthy”.

The AFA has launched “Make a Plan”, a multi-media advertising, public relations and online campaign to tackle these negative beliefs and also to communicate and validate the value of advice to clients.

“Now is the time for advisers to show their commitment to their own profession and put their money where their mouths are,” Klipin said in a statement.

“In return, we believe they will reap the benefits. At a big picture level, the campaign will help them win back the respect of consumers and at a practice level, they will secure new leads and re-kindle greater respect from any disaffected current clients.”

The Investment Trends 2010 Planner Business Model Report surveyed more than 1300 financial planners between August and October 2010 online. It also draws on a study of 1100 Australian investors carried out in December 2009.

The Investment Trends April 2010 SMSF Investor Report was based on a survey of more than 1900 SMSF investors.

14 comments on “REVEALED The value of advice: $300”
    advice client

    I disagree with Fergus about charging for the initial visit

    Finding the right adviser is very difficult for many people. The average person wants to meet someone first, obligation free, and get a feel for whether or not they think they can work with them BEFORE they commit to trusting the adviser with their money. If you charge for a coffee and chat, you will lose a lot of potential clients.

    And how much do Australian’s bet on the Melbourne Cup each year and bet on Lotto each week with no outcome? Hmmm Something is very wrong with a society/country that has it’s values upside down.

    Your basis for conclusion on the $300 fee is based on the April 2010 survey of SMSF investors. This is a fair value as from my experience these investors only require limited investment only advice, or sign off of their investment strategy. These investors usually have strong beliefs in the way they invest. Also I find $300 is profitable in such situations.

    Fergus Hardingham

    There is a significant disconnect due in part or mainly to clients being used to so called FREE ADVICE – when in fact it is built into the cost of the product (insurance / investments) via a commission…as well as smaller clients being subsidised by larger clients.

    We charge $440 for initial meetings – to get to know the client…clients who are not prepared to commit by paying a fee can go elsewhere or not get advice.

    We pay a plumber to come to us – that is the price even before they start work – why do we Financial Planners, as a group, not value what we do as much as plumbers?

    Risk Adviser

    I wonder if the survey asked about what consumers would pay for Risk Insurance advice?

    If it is no more than $300 (less than the adviser’s break even), I can’t imagine a fee-for-service model will help Australia’s under-insurance problem.

    I agree with Peter, so why has it taken this long for the FPA and AFA to get into gear to improve public knowledge of the value of Financial Advice.

    Its pretty simple really, if someone values something, they will be willing to pay for it.

    I disagree with the report concluding it costs $2700 for comprehensive and $1200 for simple advice, because those figures would include an ‘implementation’ charge, which is not advice at all.

    The more concisely our potential clients understand our services, the more they will truely value them and be willing to pay for it

    Good to see that a survey confirms what we already knew. Ordinary people go to a doctor and pay $50 for a ten minute consultation or nothing if you go to a bulk biller. Go to a dentist and sit in a chair for a scary hour and the charge is $300. Why would a visit to a financial planner cost any different.
    However go to an architect to design and supervise building a house and the bill is $50,000.
    There will always be clients that do not want to spend the money and others that will. Just like a a significant proportion of the population that will not visit a dentist and thus have rotten teeth. It is their choice and they will have to suffer the consequence.

    Ian Hamilton

    If I charged and got paid $300 for every person that comes in to see me, I would be doing heaps better financially,
    at this point I charge nothing and wait to see if I have inspired them to take the next step,

    so what should we be doing for the first $300, obtain details / facts / reasons ?.

< 1 of 2
Join the discussion