Simon Hoyle has been a finance journalist for more than 25 years – a finance journalist because the football and motorsports rounds at The Age were filled when he was awarded a cadetship. He worked on BRW and Personal Investment magazines, and was part of the team that launched Money Management. Hoyle spent 11 years at the Australian Financial Review before moving on to be an investment writer for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Australian. He was appointed editor of Professional Planner in November 2007.
Glenn Freeman is a senior journalist for Professional Planner. He has around three years’ experience in financial services journalism, having also covered broader areas of business including M&A activity and energy. His journalistic experience includes five years spent abroad, where he was editor of an oil and gas title in the United Arab Emirates along with other in-house and freelance projects, which included stints in motorcycle and automotive journalism.
All information is required
Professional Planner is recognised as the leading monthly publication for in-depth features and analysis of key issues and events that affect you, your business and your profession.
With the start date for the 2016 budget changes to superannuation approaching, Cooper Grace Ward partner Scott Hay-Bartlem is warning that now is the time to consider whether current SMSF trust deeds will be appropriate under the new regime.
‘Some SMSF trust deeds will still be adequate, but there are a significant number that contain provisions inconsistent with the new rules, or do not have appropriate terms,’ Mr Hay-Bartlem said.
‘Many SMSF trust deeds were amended in 2007 and have not been touched since.
‘In addition to the new rules, there are reasons to update now, including recent innovations in SMSF trust deed drafting, cases on binding nominations and conflicts of interest as well as substantial guidance from the ATO on a range of superannuation issues.
‘These would be advantageous to have in your SMSF trust deed,’ he said.
When contemplating an SMSF trust deed update, Mr Hay-Bartlem suggests that advisers should consider the following:
Does the deed automatically remove the limitations imposed in a transition to retirement income stream when the pensioner satisfies a full cashing condition?
Can the terms of a pension change without needing to formally stop and restart the pension, including the ability to add, remove or alter the reversionary beneficiary?
Are there sufficient options in the death benefit payment provisions? Can the trustee pay child pensions or to a superannuation proceeds trust?
Are the binding death benefit nomination and reversionary pension provisions simple to use? Are there unnecessary procedural requirements or restrictions that may render binding nominations ineffective?
Are there other death benefit control mechanisms, such as a death benefit guardian?
Is the trust deed clear about priority of death benefit lock in provisions and that future variations cannot change binding death benefit arrangements inadvertently?
Can the trustee comply with the new forms of commutation authorities and paying excess transfer balance tax, even without the consent of the member?
Does the trust deed allow for reserving of contributions and income?
Is it clear what attorneys can and cannot do on behalf of a member and are the powers appropriate?
Can the trustee segregate investments even for members not in pension phase?
Are there mechanisms to resolve disputes between members so they can exit the fund without consent of the others?
‘As with everything with SMSFs, it is important to ensure the trust deed will allow you to do the things you want and need to do,’ Mr Hay-Bartlem said.
Cut & Paste conveys information received directly from the organisations concerned. Statements and releases published here have been selected for their
relevance to the financial planning profession. They are generally unedited, and the views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of Professional Planner.
What is Cut + Paste?
Cut + Paste contains news releases, statements and other information from organisations active in financial planning and related areas. Its aim is to convey that information to you directly from those organisations. Everything published in Cut + Paste has been curated for its relevance and topicality; otherwise, it is predominantly unedited. The views expressed in Cut + Paste do not necessarily reflect those of Professional Planner. To learn more, please click here.
Have your say
Will the measures announced in the budget affect your clients?